Ford Mustang 1994 vs Opel Tigra 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 57 HP more power than Opel Tigra, whereas torque is 167 NM more than Opel Tigra. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.3 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Tigra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Tigra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 69 cm longer than the Opel Tigra, 22 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 425 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.2 metres more than that of the Opel Tigra, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |