Ford Mustang 1994 vs Jaguar XKR 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 363 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 505 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XKR is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 216 HP less power than Jaguar XKR, whereas torque is 213 NM less than Jaguar XKR. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 12.5 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XKR, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 15 cm shorter than the Jaguar XKR, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 327 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XKR has
| |