Ford Mustang 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 14 HP more power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Honda Prelude. Despite the higher power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.6 | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Prelude) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 17 cm longer than the Honda Prelude, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |