Ford Mustang 1994 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 22 HP more power than Honda CRX, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Honda CRX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda CRX) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 61 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 2.5 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Honda CRX has
| |