Ford Mustang 1994 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang 1994 engine produces 46 HP less power than Ford Mustang 1999, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Ford Mustang 1999. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 12.0 | |
|
The Ford Mustang 1994 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang 1994 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang 1999, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang 1994 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Mustang 1994 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Ford Mustang 1994 is smaller. Ford Mustang 1994 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang 1999, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang 1994 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |