Ford Mustang 1994 vs Chrysler Sebring 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 19 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 62 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 11.5 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mustang gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 15 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |