Ford Mustang 1994 vs BMW Z3 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 292 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
BMW Z3 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 46 HP less power than BMW Z3, but torque is 12 NM more than BMW Z3. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
Ford Mustang consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Ford Mustang gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 59 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 210 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.7 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |