Ford Mustang 1994 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 78 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 12 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 57 cm longer than the Audi TT, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.7 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi TT has
| |