Ford Mustang 1994 vs Audi Coupe 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 31 HP more power than Audi Coupe, whereas torque is 127 NM more than Audi Coupe. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.2 | |
|
The Audi Coupe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi Coupe) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 24 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 296 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.7 metres more than that of the Audi Coupe, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Audi Coupe has
| |