Ford Mustang 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1998
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 305 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 19 HP more power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 33 NM less than BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 12.2 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 14 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |