Ford Mustang 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 923 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |