Ford Mustang 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 298 NM | 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro have the same engine power, but Ford Mustang torque is 7 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 12.4 | |
Ford Mustang consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.91 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |