Ford Mustang 1999 vs BMW Z3 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang and BMW Z3 have the same engine power, but Ford Mustang torque is 18 NM more than BMW Z3. Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW Z3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 64 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.7 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW Z3 has
| |