Ford Mustang 1999 vs BMW 3 series 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 43 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 108 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.0 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 23 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |