Ford Mustang 1999 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 32 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 18 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 62 cm longer than the Audi TT, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.7 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi TT has
| |