Ford Mustang 1999 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang 1999 engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford Mustang 2005, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Ford Mustang 2005. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.4 | |
|
The Ford Mustang 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang 1999 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang 1999 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Mustang 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Ford Mustang 1999 is smaller. Ford Mustang 1999 is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang 2005, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang 1999 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mustang has
| |