Ford Mustang 2005 vs Renault Laguna 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 134 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 157 NM more than Renault Laguna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 8.8 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Laguna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Laguna 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 13 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 423 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 73 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |