Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mercedes CLS 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 32 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 77 NM more than Mercedes CLS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 15 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 155 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |