Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mercedes CL 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 5.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 388 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 84 HP less power than Mercedes CL, whereas torque is 103 NM less than Mercedes CL. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 12.1 | |
|
The Mercedes CL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 30 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 140 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |