Ford Mustang 2005 vs Mazda RX-8 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 112 HP more power than Mazda RX-8, whereas torque is 207 NM more than Mazda RX-8. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.8 | |
|
The Mazda RX-8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda RX-8, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Mazda RX-8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda RX-8 2003 1.3 engine: This rotor motor is very specific and capricious. It will suit the true enthusiast who is prepared to put up with high fuel and oil consumption as well as relatively frequent maintenance and repair work. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 34 cm longer than the Mazda RX-8, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda RX-8. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |