Ford Mustang 2005 vs Jaguar XK 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 4 HP more power than Jaguar XK, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Jaguar XK. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 3 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 330 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 20 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |