Ford Mustang 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 41 HP less power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.8 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 32 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 106 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |