Ford Mustang 2005 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 86 HP more power than Chrysler Crossfire, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Crossfire is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Crossfire gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 71 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 215 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 135 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chrysler Crossfire has
| |