Ford Mustang 2005 vs BMW 6 series 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 304 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 427 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
Ford Mustang engine produces 46 HP more power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 127 NM more than BMW 6 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 9.5 | |
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
BMW 6 sērija 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2004 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang is 6 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 450 litres | |
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |