Ford Mustang 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 161 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 227 NM more than BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 840 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 28 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 410 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 60 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |