Ford Mustang 2005 vs Audi TT 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 304 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 104 HP more power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Audi TT. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 7.7 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 795 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 59 cm longer than the Audi TT, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 700 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 60 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`680 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Audi TT has
| |