Ford Mustang 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 212 HP | 253 HP | |
Torque: | 325 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Ford Mustang engine produces 41 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Despite less power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
By specification Ford Mustang consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mustang consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 26 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 504 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 154 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`180 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |