Ford Mustang 2005 vs Jaguar XKR 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 420 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XKR is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 208 HP less power than Jaguar XKR, whereas torque is 235 NM less than Jaguar XKR. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.6 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XKR, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XKR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 3 cm shorter than the Jaguar XKR, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar XKR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XKR has
| |