Ford Mustang 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 212 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 19 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.8 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 32 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 106 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |