Ford Mustang 2005 vs Dodge Avenger 2007
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 212 HP | 235 HP | |
Torque: | 325 NM | 232 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Mustang engine produces 23 HP less power than Dodge Avenger, but torque is 93 NM more than Dodge Avenger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Dodge Avenger) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.50 m | |
Ford Mustang is 8 cm shorter than the Dodge Avenger, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 450 litres | |
Dodge Avenger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 100 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Avenger. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Avenger has
| |