Ford Mustang 2008 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 200 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 166 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.0 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 25 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 156 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |