Ford Mustang 2006 vs Ford Mustang 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 500 HP | 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang 2006 engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Mustang 2011. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 13.1 | |
|
The Ford Mustang 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang 2006 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang 2011, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mustang 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mustang 2006 is smaller. Ford Mustang 2006 is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang 2011, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang 2006 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 379 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang 2011 has more luggage space. Ford Mustang 2006 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |