Ford Mustang 2006 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 500 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 650 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 155 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Dodge Charger. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 11.8 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 33 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 108 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |