Ford Mustang 2011 vs Jaguar XK 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 550 HP | 385 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 515 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 165 HP more power than Jaguar XK. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 11.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 2 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 379 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 79 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |