Ford Mustang 2011 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 550 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 205 HP more power than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 11.8 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.04 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 31 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 379 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 77 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |