Ford Mustang 2009 vs Mercedes CLS 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 316 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 151 NM more than Mercedes CLS. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 6.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 945 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mercedes CLS 2008 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 137 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |