Ford Mustang 2009 vs Mercedes CLS 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 234 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 321 NM more than Mercedes CLS. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 6.8 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 7.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 1065 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 16 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 152 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |