Ford Mustang 2009 vs Mercedes CL 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 517 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 830 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CL is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 23 HP more power than Mercedes CL, but torque is 139 NM less than Mercedes CL. Despite the higher power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 14.3 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 29 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 122 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes CL, which means Ford Mustang can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |