Ford Mustang 2009 vs Mercedes C class 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 300 HP more power than Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 7.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 1110 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 19 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 82 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |