Ford Mustang 2009 vs Jaguar XK 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 540 HP | 385 HP | |
Torque: | 691 NM | 515 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 155 HP more power than Jaguar XK, whereas torque is 176 NM more than Jaguar XK. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.2 | |
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
570 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
Ford Mustang is smaller, but higher. Ford Mustang is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 300 litres | |
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 68 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jaguar XK. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |