Ford Mustang 2009 vs Ford Mustang 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang 2009 engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Mustang 2006, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Ford Mustang 2006. Despite the higher power, Ford Mustang 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.6 | |
|
The Ford Mustang 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang 2009 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang 2009 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mustang 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mustang 2009 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Mustang 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 348 litres | |
| Ford Mustang 2009 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |