Ford Mustang 2009 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 6 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 195 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 166 NM more than Dodge Charger. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.8 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller. Ford Mustang is 30 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 88 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.9 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger, which means Ford Mustang can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |