Ford Mustang 2009 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 312 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 228 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 314 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.1 | |
|
The Chevrolet Camaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Camaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Mustang is 6 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 48 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |