Ford Mustang 2009 vs BMW 3 series 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 363 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 341 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 4.8 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 9.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 1365 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 17 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |