Ford Mustang 2009 vs Audi A5 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 540 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 691 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 370 HP more power than Audi A5, whereas torque is 441 NM more than Audi A5. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 7.1 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 6.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 1020 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 16 cm longer than the Audi A5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 368 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 87 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Ford Mustang can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`856 | 1`895 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Audi A5 has
| |