Ford Mustang 2014 vs Mercedes E class 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 125 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 107 NM more than Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mercedes E klase 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes E klase 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 425 litres | |
| Ford Mustang has 17 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |