Ford Mustang 2014 vs Mercedes CLS 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Mustang) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mercedes CLS) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 57 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, but torque is 213 NM less than Mercedes CLS. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 59 litres | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 15 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 475 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Ford Mustang has 67 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 400 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |