Ford Mustang 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 309 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 125 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 137 NM more than BMW 4 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 15 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 445 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 37 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW 4 series, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |