Ford Mustang 2017 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mustang
2017 - 2023
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.3 - 5.2 (petrol)1.8 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mercedes CLK is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 310 - 760 HP150 - 481 HP
Torque: 475 - 847 NM240 - 630 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 5.8 seconds4.7 - 10.4 seconds
In general, Ford Mustang are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mercedes CLK. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.0 - 16.86.4 - 14.2
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.65 m
Width: 1.92 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mustang is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 408 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`132 kg~ 2`071 kg
Net weight:~ 1`688 kg~ 1`544 kg
Load capacity:~ 444 kg~ 527 kg
Ford Mustang load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Mercedes CLK. Therefore, Mercedes CLK is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 33 8004400
Pros and Cons: Ford Mustang has
  • only petrol engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Mercedes CLK has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv