Ford Mustang 2017 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mercedes CLK is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 317 - 421 HP | 150 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 432 - 530 NM | 240 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 5.8 seconds | 4.7 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 13.5 | 6.4 - 14.2 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 13 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 435 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 27 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 2`071 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 37 800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |