Ford Mustang 2017 vs Jaguar XK 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Mustang is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XK is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 317 - 421 HP | 385 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 432 - 530 NM | 515 - 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 5.8 seconds | 4.4 - 5.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 13.5 | 11.2 - 12.3 | |
|
Ford Mustang petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 330 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 78 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 2`122 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |